Austin Apartment Reviews Guide
Menu

Affordable & Income-Restricted Housing in Pflugerville, TX

Affordable & Income-Restricted Housing in Greater Austin

What this category covers

Affordable and income-restricted housing in Pflugerville refers to apartment communities that set rents based on a household's income rather than pure market rate. Most of these properties operate under programs like the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), Section 8 project-based assistance, or local bond financing agreements. In exchange for lower rents, residents typically need to fall under a set percentage of the area median income (AMI), often 30%, 50%, 60%, or 80% depending on the unit and program. Some communities mix income-restricted units with market-rate ones in the same building.

What to look for before you apply

Start with the income limits and documentation requirements: pay stubs, tax returns, and asset statements are standard, and limits vary by household size. Ask about waitlists, since many of these communities in Pflugerville have longer application timelines than standard apartments. Check what's actually included in rent (water, trash, some utilities), whether the unit count and floor plans fit your household size, and how the property has been maintained. Location matters too: proximity to the 130 corridor, Pflugerville ISD schools, and bus routes can make a real difference for daily life.

How our scoring helps

We rank the 25 communities in this category using consistent criteria: maintenance condition, management responsiveness, unit quality, and how accurately the property represents its income and rent terms. See the full ranked list at our best apartment complexes guide, and read how we weigh each factor on the methodology page.

Let us match you with affordable & income-restricted housing in Pflugerville, TX

No cost, no obligation. Tell us what you need and we will connect you with providers that fit your requirements.

Get quotes

All affordable & income-restricted housing in Pflugerville, TX, ranked by score and relevance

25 businesses, scored on recent reviews. The order weighs each business's overall score by how much of its reviewed work is affordable & income-restricted housing, so a lower-scored specialist can rank above a higher-scored generalist.

Amberlin Pflugerville
4.8(78)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise Amberlin as a warm, well-run community where staff know their names and neighbors become lasting friends. Management stands out, especially Stephanie Salinas and Nick M., who treat residents as family, fix problems quickly, and coordinate daily activities ranging from yoga to movie nights without making participation mandatory. The physical plant earns high marks: apartments have generous closet space and large balconies, grounds stay clean and quiet, and amenities span a full gym, pool, library, and movie room. Staff like Mark in Apartment Life assist with tech setup, and maintenance staff address HVAC and other issues promptly. Pets live here too without stigma. For those 55 and over weighing a move, the community's emphasis on genuine connection over sales pressure appears to be the real draw.

The Emerson Apartments
4.4(283)✓ Google-verified

Most residents report feeling safe and welcome, with staff known by name for their attentiveness to maintenance emergencies and day-to-day requests. Management earns repeated praise for kindness and speed, though one recent complaint flags a six-month delay in deposit return after move-out.

Ashwood Apartments
4.3(260)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise fast maintenance response and genuinely friendly front-office staff, especially Jimmy, who handles move-ins with care and follow-up. Units are spacious and clean; grounds are quiet and well-maintained. The community suits long-term renters and those seeking a welcoming environment, though one tenant felt the property manager's enforcement of parking rules lacked compassion during a personal crisis.

Enclave Falcon Pointe Apartments
4.2(172)✓ Google-verified

Most residents celebrate the welcoming atmosphere, cleanliness, and staff names like Savannah, Phoenix, Ashley, and Zarria. Common praise highlights spacious units, the pool, gym, and proximity to shopping and trails. However, move-out is contentious: residents report full security deposit deductions with no clear documentation, and handling of disputes bounces between offices without resolution.

LC Pflugerville
4.2(90)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

LC Pflugerville residents consistently report smooth moves, welcoming staff, and a genuinely connected community. The property stays clean, maintenance responds quickly, and amenities like the pool, gym, and The Goat restaurant make it feel upscale without demanding a luxury price. Location near Stone Hill, Target, and HEB matters to daily life, and most residents appreciate the safety and friendly neighbors. Minor issues (pet waste, occasional noise, package handling) rarely dampen the overall experience. Staff turnover in the leasing office has not undercut service quality. Named standouts like Hailee and Chelsea are praised for professionalism during tours and lease-signing. Residents staying 2+ years describe management as genuinely compassionate about problem-solving, from emergency unit swaps to move-in specials. The community feels modern, intentional, and backed by staff who seem to care.

Let us match you with affordable & income-restricted housing in Pflugerville, TX

No cost, no obligation. Tell us what you need and we will connect you with providers that fit your requirements.

Get quotes
Wells Park
4.3(230)✓ Google-verified

Wells Park's apartments are consistently clean and peaceful, with leasing staff like Mayani and Chris earning regular praise for patience and helpfulness during move-in. However, phone responsiveness is spotty, and communication can drag once residents are settled or departing, leaving some frustrated with unaddressed concerns.

Biltmore at the Park
4.3(165)✓ Google-verified

Residents split sharply on this property: those praising the apartments and individual staff members (Serena, Robert, Lindsey) love the quiet location and fast maintenance, while others report months of unresolved billing disputes, roach infestations, and unresponsive management since RPM took over. The unit itself is worth living in; the office experience is where things collapse.

The Oaks at Techridge
4.0(224)✓ Google-verified

Tenants consistently praise the leasing staff, especially Assistant Community Manager Shielyn, for attentive and stress-free service during tours and move-ins. Units are clean and bright, maintenance responds fast, and the grounds feel safe and maintained. However, some residents face serious concerns: pest control is slow despite reported infestations, nightly commercial traffic creates constant noise for street-facing units, theft from garages has occurred with minimal security response, and monthly rent increases frustrate those who signed on promotional rates. A strong experience for some; a deal-breaker for others. The standout strength is customer-facing service during the leasing process and early residency. The maintenance team handles minor issues the same day. Weak points emerge over time: pest management, building security, and unexpected fee hikes after signing. Proximity to commercial operations on the opposite street side heavily impacts units with that view. No elevators limits convenience for residents on upper floors.

Villas Tech Ridge
3.7(341)✓ Google-verified

Tenants consistently praise the leasing and office staff, particularly Cayla Moore, Keila, and the management team, who handle inquiries, tours, and even special circumstances like prior bankruptcies with genuine care and speed. Maintenance responds quickly, the community feels organized and quiet, and move-ins are smooth. However, recent reports flag roaches, vehicle break-ins in the parking lot, and earlier security issues when gates were broken. These safety and pest concerns warrant attention before committing. Residents value the resident portal, gym, outdoor amenities like the pool and cabanas, and the overall managed feel. The staff's willingness to work around financial barriers stands out. Package delivery tracking needs work. For those sensitive to pest risks or needing very secure parking, these gaps matter.

Lakewood Apartments
3.8(261)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the quiet atmosphere, spacious layouts, and quick maintenance response times. However, significant gaps in security (no parking camera coverage), aggressive towing practices, and inconsistent staff attitudes undermine confidence, especially for vulnerable residents.

Townes on Tenth
4.0(102)✓ Google-verified

Townes on Tenth divides sharply along management lines. Before the Avenue5 takeover, residents praised Delaney, Waracy, and Megan for going above and beyond on maintenance and community care. Since the changeover, tenants report aggressive fee charging, recurring payment system failures, improper late fees, and removal of online payment options. Aging appliances and inconsistent move-in standards add minor friction to the mix.

Legacy Ranch at Dessau East
3.9(69)✓ Google-verified

Abraham and the front desk team earn frequent praise for genuine care and quick problem-solving, with recent management changes bringing relief to residents tired of inattention. But serious gaps remain: vehicle towing without explanation, poor coordination with the towing company, and a critical lapse when ice covered senior-accessible pathways for days after snow. Maintenance responds quickly to repair requests like refrigerator replacement. The community feels safe overall, with new amenities and friendly staff setting a welcoming tone. Yet the ice incident and parking restrictions point to a management that sometimes prioritizes rules over resident safety and dignity.

The Arden Apartments
3.7(301)✓ Google-verified

Maintenance arrives quickly when called, and many residents praise individual staff members for professionalism and speed. The pools, gym, and dog park draw people in, and spacious floor plans appeal to families. Yet tenants report maintenance entering without knocking, leasing agents ignoring follow-ups, and no fix for recurring car break-ins despite complaints. Management deflects security concerns and avoids funding common-area upkeep on weekends. After two years, some long-term residents are weighing their exit.

Stone Hill

#14Stone Hill

80
4.4(251)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the staff, especially Claudia, Iris, and Shadow, for responsiveness and genuine care. Maintenance arrives on time and handles requests quickly, and the community is notably quiet with reasonable rents. Management excellence and fast repairs stand out. Most complaints focus on move-out fees and occasional pest problems in garbage areas, though these are rare. Long-term residents stay and renew leases, citing the grounds and amenities.

Jolie Pflugerville
4.8(62)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff earn repeated praise for genuine care, from patient leasing tours with Kirra and Spencer to responsive management handling maintenance and resident events. Clean grounds, a fitness center, game room, bark park, pickleball court, and frequent activities create a cohesive 55+ community, though pricing online may not match quotes at the office, and one reviewer flagged hidden fees and poor phone access. A significant gap exists between the advertised 55+ focus and actual enforcement of age restrictions, and parking limitations frustrated at least one resident. The leasing experience itself stands out as personalized and unhurried.

The Beacon at Pfluger Farm
3.8(90)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing team and speedy maintenance resolutions draw praise from recent movers, but long-term residents report a noticeable shift since Valiant Residential took over management. Persistent AC problems, thin walls catching every neighbor sound, and deteriorating shared-space upkeep have frustrated tenants who appreciated the complex under previous ownership. Professionalism varies noticeably at the leasing desk.

Camille Farms
4.0(588)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Camille Farms delivers strong leasing and maintenance response for most residents, with staff like Sariana, Ximena, Tania, and Rodolfo earning consistent praise for friendliness and efficiency. However, a vocal minority reports serious gaps: management ignores emails about safety concerns and building maintenance, cockroaches return after one fumigation attempt, stairwells stay filthy for months, and parking enforcement is harsh. The gap between smooth move-ins and neglected follow-up maintenance suggests management may be stretched or indifferent once residents are locked into leases.

Lantower Ambrosio Apartments
3.6(396)✓ Google-verified

Jonathan Nieto, the maintenance technician, earns repeated five-star praise for fast repairs and a professional manner. However, serious security lapses undermine the community: residents report car thefts, vandalism, gates left open, and non-functional cameras, coupled with cockroach infestations and poor unit cleanliness at turnover. Front-desk staff receive warmth, yet leasing management shows little responsiveness to move-out disputes over damage charges and cleaning fees. The split reflects a property split between competent maintenance and systemic problems in security, pest control, and lease-end handling. A maintenance technician cannot fix a gated community that fails to gate, nor address a building-wide infestation. Reviewers who praise the place often focus narrowly on their own service interactions; those filing complaints raise concerns about resident safety and fair deposit return.

Lantower Edgewater Apartments
3.6(333)✓ Google-verified

Lantower Edgewater's maintenance team earns consistent praise for quick fixes, and newer leadership has stabilized operations after years of mismanagement. However, residents report chronic gate failures, ignored noise complaints, aggressive move-out charges, pest problems, and difficulty reaching the office by phone or email, which undercut the otherwise decent unit quality and earlier improvements.

Oxford at Santa Clara Apartments
3.4(372)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Five-star residents praise the friendly staff (especially office manager Jalisha), clean grounds, and strong fitness and pool amenities. One-star reviewers cite neglected common areas, broken equipment left unfixed, and aggressive towing that charges $350 to retrieve cars, along with strict move-out requirements that threaten credit.

Villas at Grand Avenue
3.2(228)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents and new movers praise the front office staff, particularly Maria and maintenance team members like Terence and Jay, for quick responses and genuine care. However, recurring complaints about water heaters, broken gates, cockroaches, overflowing dumpsters, and harsh move-out charges paint a picture of declining property conditions and inconsistent management follow-through between the friendly faces at check-in and the actual living experience.

Stoneridge Apartments
3.6(168)✓ Google-verified

New management has brought real momentum. Pool finally reopened, maintenance (DJ and Rashad especially) respond fast and complete work right the first time, and staff like Gianna show genuine flexibility during tenant hardship. Playground, courts, and food pantry add family value. But reputation damage lingers: pest complaints resurface every year, pool sits green when open, buildings show their age, and initial check-in can feel unwelcoming. Recent reviews skew positive, yet one-star ratings point to recurring issues that haven't fully resolved.

Collier Apartments
4.0(300)✓ Google-verified

Collier divides reviewers sharply. Many praise friendly staff, spacious units, and quiet grounds, with some reporting AC fixes within a day. Others describe severe problems: roaches and ants, AC broken for a week in Texas heat with management unresponsive, and gates that malfunction. A technician named Jose drew specific praise for going above and beyond, but systemic maintenance delays and health issues during hot weather haunt lower ratings.

The Highlands Luxury Apartments
3.9(209)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Maintenance staff earn consistent praise for speed and professionalism, and several residents report clean units and peaceful living. However, management has drawn sharp criticism for ignoring complaints about noise, refusing to address trespassing and pest problems, and enforcing lease rules inconsistently after residents have already signed.

Cambridge Villas

#25Cambridge Villas

53 low data
3.5(63)✓ Google-verified

Residents report a warm community where long-term neighbors feel like family and maintenance responds quickly to requests. However, reviews are sharply divided: some praise cleanliness and activities, while others describe rat problems, garbage piles, and staff rudeness.

Request quotes from our featured partners

How many quotes do you want?

By submitting this request you agree that we share it with providers relevant to your needs.

Enquiries you submit through our forms may be passed to partner providers, and we may receive a referral fee. Our rankings and scores are based solely on our published method and are not influenced by referral fees.

Common questions about affordable & income-restricted housing

How much does income-restricted housing cost in Pflugerville?
Rent is typically set as a percentage of area median income rather than a flat market price, so a one-bedroom might run well below nearby market-rate units, often several hundred dollars less per month. Exact figures depend on your household income tier and the specific program funding the property.
How long is the waitlist for these apartments?
Waitlists vary widely by property and unit size, ranging from a few weeks to over a year for larger units or the most in-demand communities. It's worth applying to multiple properties at once and asking directly about current waitlist length when you call.
What documents do I need to apply?
Expect to provide proof of income for every adult household member (pay stubs, W-2s, or tax returns), photo ID, and sometimes bank statements or asset documentation. Self-employed applicants may need additional paperwork like profit-and-loss statements.
How do I judge whether a community is well run?
Look at how quickly maintenance requests get resolved, whether common areas and grounds are kept up, and how clearly staff explain income recertification requirements. Touring in person and asking current residents about their experience tells you more than the listing photos.

Last updated 2026-07-17