Leasing staff earn consistent praise for move-in support and responsiveness. Maintenance handles urgent repairs quickly. However, persistent pest problems, aging infrastructure, and management's apparent reluctance to address noise and neighbor complaints undermine the experience for some residents. Long-term tenant satisfaction varies sharply.
As listed on Google.
Credentials claimed:Equal housing opportunity
As published by the business on its own website; not independently verified.
Only 2 Google reviews available (split between 5-star and 1-2-star ratings). Insufficient evidence for specific praise or complaint patterns. Their website lists fully-furnished units with kitchens, in-unit laundry, fitness center, yoga studio, pool, doggie spa, and conference facilities.
Half the residents praise 95Twenty for responsive maintenance and a calm neighborhood; the other half feel the price is unjustifiable given management's dismissiveness and neglect of common areas. Maintenance staff like Randy and Joey solve problems quickly, yet the leasing office frequently breaks commitments, ignores referral credits, and charges surprise move-out fees. The complex works well for quiet living and commuters but requires patience with management and careful lease scrutiny. Reviewers consistently name staff members (Kathy, Alyson, Ivy, Victor, Joey, Randy) who went above and beyond, contrasting sharply with complaints about gate malfunctions, dirty pools, pest complaints, and expensive covered parking. The rating split is severe: 50% five-star but 31% one-or-two-star, reflecting genuine experience gaps depending on which team members handle your needs.
Staff members Tabitha, Abby, and Maria earn repeated praise for taking time with tenants and resolving issues promptly, backed by strong maintenance response times. Move-in costs and parking fees concern some residents, and a few cite maintenance gaps like broken gates and a filled-in hot tub rather than proper repairs.
Last updated 2026-07-17
